The Cycle of Evolving Design Systems: A Deep Dive
In the fast-paced digital design world, staying relevant requires more than keeping up with the latest trends. It’s about understanding the evolving tools, methodologies, and best practices landscape. Having built a design system for a growing trucking software company, I can testify to the dynamism and the ever-revolving cycle that defines this process. Here’s my perspective on the intricate journey of design systems.
From Simple Libraries to Holistic Systems
When Figma rolled out its auto-layout feature, the design landscape was abuzz. I took it upon myself to optimize our existing UI library, thinking it’d be straightforward. But boy, was I in for a ride! I soon realized that our library needed coherence, with an evident disconnect between the components’ designs and their in-production versions.
This realization took me from merely tweaking components to orchestrating an entire design system. The difference? A UI library is a mere set of features and styles. In contrast, a design system is a more comprehensive entity, like the strong dog standing next to its weaker counterpart. It’s a guidebook that outlines how to manage and use these components.
User-Centric Design Systems
Drawing parallels with software products, the true essence of a design system lies in its user-centricity. This duality of users – the end consumers and the product designers – is central. The idea is simple: a well-thought-out design system empowers designers to create an intuitive user experience, freeing them from menial decisions like button colors. It’s a building block, a product for products, much like the foundation in a Lego structure.
This foundation’s stability, however, hinges on the cohesion between designers and developers. Like two inseparable atoms, the two teams must work hand-in-hand. It ensures that the end product aligns with the vision set out in the design system. This harmony becomes even more critical when considering accessibility. Equal access to technology is a right, and this inclusivity should resonate from the very core of every design system.
Naming, Not Just a Naming Game
Speaking of cores, while the allure of fancy names for color tokens might seem irresistible (I’ve been guilty of naming a shade ‘Malachite’), it’s essential to strike a balance. With the challenge of dark mode knocking on the doors, it became clear that context-agnostic naming was the need of the hour.
Cross-Functional Collaboration: The Real MVP
No design system can thrive in isolation. And it’s not just about the designers and developers. Marketing, branding, and customer experience teams – all play a role. When every stakeholder has a say, the resulting design system becomes more holistic, aligned with the brand’s vision.
The most intriguing part of my journey was realizing the ever-evolving nature of design systems. Like the infinite loop portrayed by the keyboard cat, the cycle of refinement, feedback, and adaptation is unending. It requires constant vigilance, with updates, bug fixes, and feature additions.
In Conclusion: An Ongoing Journey
The path of curating a design system is far from linear. It’s a winding road with ups and downs, like navigating through an architectural marvel of an upside-down house. But as the cycles of improvements continue, one thing becomes clear: empowering collaborators with the right tools and knowledge paves the way for lasting success.